🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the Britain, and it seems it’s time for a rethink. Throughout its history, an observance that began as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, expanding to include gatherings where Black people are compensated to speak with predominantly white listeners about implicit prejudice and active solidarity. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests generated a rise in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. However, that period has concluded. The surge has reached its height, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Observance

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of remembrance and recognition in the February's second week. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in winter, but also in October in the UK, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The month has developed since that time, focusing less on the accounts of the slave trade across the Atlantic and struggles for equality, and more on notable African descendants in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with discussions and heritage festivities. But the manner the month is commemorated is a manifestation of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a instructive case in how co-option leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reevaluate Black History Month better than the specific period in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a revitalized conservative movement in the form of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the recent season we witnessed the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels emboldened to say that the absence of Caucasian individuals in certain urban areas is a source of worry. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are growing in the EU as a whole.

In the United States, a colossal assault against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to remove African American heritage and legacy from the archives is ongoing. One of the former president's early administrative commands aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

Against this backdrop, the observance symbolises how little it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the conditions of the present. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is separated from the broader ongoing work that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at a learning establishment, expressed it perfectly when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Figuring out how to alter, change and broaden actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a urge to just eliminate events including Black History Month entirely, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are vestiges of an time that has not worked.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and legacy of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an framework that a lot of work has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as some institutions are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around notable African descendants) integrated into educational programs. It would also be a period that does not shy away from political issues, and leaves space for individuals, particularly the younger generation, to express their concerns and stories. What value has mere awareness of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the urban areas? Organizations who mark it should not be comforted with the neutral terminology of hidden discrimination and alertness to “microaggressions”, but challenged by the risks that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made contemporary, urgent, and reactive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Present-Day African Heritage Celebration.